Injection Machine Screw And Barrel The Injection Machine Screw and Barrel are essential components of the injection molding machine. The screw, often referred to as the auger, is a rotating element that functions to transport, plasticize, and compress the material (typically plastic) before injecting it into the mold. The barrel, on the other hand, is a static tube that houses the screw and serves as the chamber where the Plastic Material is heated and melted before being propelled forward by the screw. Advantages: Precision and Efficiency: Material Versatility: Durability and Longevity: Energy Efficiency: Maintenance Convenience: Precision Screw And Barrel Injection Molding Equipment,Precision Injection Screw And Barrel,Hexagonal Socket Screws And Barrel,Accurate Injection Molding Screw Ningbo Outai Plastic Machinery Technology Co.,Ltd , https://www.outacmachine.com
The patent, two words, is both a weapon of self-interest protection and a murderous killer. Xiaobian today is going to talk about the topic of LED patents. According to foreign media reports on the 19th, South Korea's LED factory Seoul Semiconductor will launch a patent war without smoke for global lighting, television and other manufacturers, and has issued infringement warnings to 29 companies around the world such as Taiwan/Land/US/Europe. . It is understood that Seoul Semiconductor visited 29 companies that were infringed by Seoul Semiconductor for the three-month period from September, and explained the infringement issues, and strongly urged these companies to respect intellectual property rights. Infringement warnings issued by Seoul Semiconductor include four Taiwanese manufacturers such as Rongchuang (AOT, 3437), 15 mainland manufacturers such as Skywotth, 6 US manufacturers such as Feit, and 3 European manufacturers including LEDVANCE. According to Seoul Semiconductor, Taiwan’s Rongchuang was infringed by Taiwan and South Korean courts as early as 2006, but Rongchuang only changed parts and models and continued to sell infringing goods. According to reports, Seoul Semiconductor is well known in the IT industry for its ultra-strong attitude toward patents. In 2006, Seoul Semiconductor and the global LED manufacturer Japan Nichia began a patent lawsuit. After three years of fighting, the two parties signed a mutual authorization contract and began to give up. In fact, Nichia is not a fuel-efficient lamp, and it is also a litigation saga in the LED industry. In recent years, the road to appealing for rights protection has gone further and further, and many patent cases have been provoked by disagreement. Some people have commented that this move has warned the manufacturers of the entire industry and also caused many manufacturers. Worried. In the past ten years, the semiconductor lighting market has grown rapidly, and LED intellectual property has become the focus of competition in the international semiconductor lighting industry. Throughout the current global LED intellectual property pattern, the core patents of the industry are still dominated by international giants such as Japan, Toyota Synthetic, Cree, Philips and Osram. Therefore, the industry believes that the role of Nichia from the past low-key research has turned into a role of high-profile rights protection, a large part of the reason is that it is not satisfied with the Japanese domestic market, looking at the global semiconductor market share. New regulations Patent application information or inclusion of credit records Patentes are receiving increasing attention and attention, and they are also a good thing. Due to historical reasons, the construction of China's intellectual property system started late. However, after the implementation of reform and opening up, in order to accelerate the development of social productive forces and promote overall social progress, adapt to the needs of the development of the socialist market economy, and promote integration with the world economy, China has already accelerated the pace of building intellectual property protection systems. It is said that in the period of the 13th Five-Year Plan (2016-2020), the realization of patent applications from multi-directional excellence to large-to-strong transformation is the most important task in promoting the development of patents. In this context, the State Intellectual Property Office officially launched the “Regulations on Patent Application Behavior†in August 2016 to regulate some new and more prominent abnormal patent applications in the real world and further improve the quality of patents. A number of regulations" revision work. According to reports, the reasons for the revision of the "Several Provisions" by the State Intellectual Property Office, from a macro level, the "Several Opinions of the State Council on Accelerating the Construction of Intellectual Property Power in the New Situation" clearly stated that it is necessary to implement the patent quality improvement project and solve the knowledge. The problem of large property rights is not strong, but not superior. In practice, the State Intellectual Property Office issued the “Several Provisions†in 2007, which listed the behaviors of two typical abnormal patent applications and proposed corresponding measures. From the operational level, the implementation of the "Several Provisions" has played a certain role in curbing the abnormal patent application behavior, but in reality, some new and more prominent abnormal patent application behaviors have appeared, which need to be regulated to further enhance Patent quality. The amendments to the "Several Provisions" mainly include two points. One is to increase the behavior of abnormal patent applications, and the other is to increase the handling measures for abnormal patent applications. In the "Several Provisions", the act of an abnormal patent application involves the filing of multiple patent applications that are clearly identical or clearly copied from existing or existing designs. The new abnormal patent application behaviors that appear in reality mainly include: simply replacing or splicing different materials, components, ratios, components, etc., and submitting multiple patent applications; submitting multiple pieces by fabricating experimental data or technical effects. Patent application; submit multiple patent applications by computer technology to randomly generate product shapes, patterns or colors. In addition, in reality, there are cases where individual units or individuals write and help others to submit abnormal patent applications. Therefore, the modification will help others to submit abnormal patent applications and is also included in the draft for comments. In order to increase the intensity of crackdown on non-performing patent applications, the "Several Provisions" stipulates six treatment measures for abnormal patent applications. In order to further enhance the deterrent effect, the Exposure Draft strengthens the handling of abnormal patent application behaviors. On the basis of not paying the patent fees and requesting payment, the applicants who submit serious patent applications are not subject to the situation. The patent fee will not be reduced within 5 years from the current year; for applicants who enjoy local subsidies and awards, except for the suggestion that local IP offices do not grant, reward, or recover, it is recommended that they will not be granted for five years from the current year. Funding or reward; for the applicants, agencies or organizations or individuals who help others to submit abnormal patent applications, the relevant information shall be incorporated into the national credit information sharing platform.